Legal Opinion

Cindy Lynn Whitehurst v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided March 11, 2014No. 0531131PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Judge.

Cindy Lynn Whitehurst, appellant, was convicted, in a bench trial, of possessing a Schedule I or II controlled substance, with the intent to distribute in violation of Code § 18.2-248. On appeal, she contends the admission of the drug certificate of analysis violated her Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. For the reasons stated, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

BACKGROUND

On appeal, we will consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, as it prevailed in the trial court. Beasley v. Commonwealth, 60 Va.App. 381, 391, 728 S.E.2d 499, 504 (2012).

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Florida v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sean Patrick Wolfe v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2016
  2. Joseph John Melick v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
  3. Andrew Nicholas Chavis v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
  4. Arzu v. ClarkeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2023
  5. Brandon Dominic Winder v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API