Legal Opinion

Fruitland Irrigation Co. v. Kruemling

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 5, 1916No. 8476PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Error to Delta District Court. Hon. Thomas J. Black, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Plaintiff in error, the Fruitland Irrigation Company, is claimant of the Fruitland Hitch, and the Onion Valley Reservoir. One of the defendants in error, the Grand View Canal and Irrigation Company, is claimant of the Castle Peak Ditch, and the several other defendants in *161error are claimants of the Dyer Fork Ditch. These ditches and the reservoir are in "Water District No. 40, and their source of supply is Crystal Creek and its tributaries.

On February 14th, 1900, a petition was filed in the District Court of Delta County, by one Ayer and others, for an adjudication of water rights within the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Larimer County Reservoir Co. v. People ex rel. LutheSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  3. Cache La Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Larimer & Weld Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  4. Water Supply & Storage Co. v. Larimer & Weld Irrigaton Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  5. Taughenbaugh v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. City & County of Denver v. Northern Colorado Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Vidler Tunnel Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API