Legal Opinion
Perkins Glue Co. v. Gould Mfg. Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 3, 1922No. Nos. 1117, 1118PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. Separate suits for infringement of a patent by the Perkins Glue Company against the Gould Manufacturing Company and' others and against the Wisconsin Chair Company and others.
1Opinion of the Court
GEIGER, District Judge.
These two cases rest upon the reissue patent to Perkins which was the subject of consideration in Perkins Glue Co. v. Solva Waterproof Co. (D. C.) reported in 223 Fed. 792 (D. C. N. D. Ill.) and Id. (C. C. A. 7th Cir.) 251 Fed. 64. Claims Nos. 28, 30, and 31 are in issue:
“28. A glue comprising cassava carbohydrate rendered semifluid by digestion and having substantially the properties of animal glue.” .
“30. A wood and fiber glue formed of a starchy carbohydrate or its equivalent by union therewith of about three parts or less by weight of water and alkali metal hydroxid.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Solva Waterproof Glue Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Solva Waterproof Glue Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Holland Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Gould Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1923
- Perkins Glue Co. v. Standard Furniture Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923