Legal Opinion
Brito v. Loft & Ladle Restaurant
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided July 27, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.
Plaintiff Angel Brito (“Brito”) has appealed the damages awarded to him after the entry of a default judgment against defendant Loft and Ladle Restaurant (“Loft and Ladle”).
*116The facts are not disputed. While Brito was at the Loft and Ladle, he was pelted with beer bottles. He was taken by ambulance to the hospital and received stitches for the lacerations he sustained. The hospital bill for Brito’s treatment was $168.19. The lacerations resulted in permanent scars. Specifically, Brito has a four-inch scar on his chest and three scars of varying lengths and widths on his neck, the largest of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Demoulas v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Sundex, Ltd. v. AntifonarioMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
- Stamos v. JacobsenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1987
- Casillo v. Worcester Area Transportation Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001
- Mutual Oil Co. v. A.A. Sunoco, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Porcaro v. O'RourkeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008
- Consumer Product Distributors, Inc. v. Toy Town Pit Stop, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
- Attachi v. KephartMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Perone v. PlaceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010