Legal Opinion

In re Kapel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1995No. 95-447PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree that Kevin M. Kapel has not sufficiently demonstrated his present character and fitness for admission to the practice of law in Ohio. We also concur in the board’s recommendation. Accordingly, Kapel’s pending applications to take the Ohio Bar Examination are disapproved, and he may not reapply until necessary for the February 1996 Bar examination.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re DickensOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. In re Application of CorriganOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Application of MikulinOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. In re Application of DaubenmireOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  5. In re Application of KapelOhio Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API