Legal Opinion

Brandow v. Vroman

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion to set aside service of summons in an action of foreclosure.

1Opinion of the CourtChester, J.

This action is brought for the foreclosure of a mortgage made by the defendant Jesse O. Vroman to the plaintiff. Before the commencement of the action a receiver of Vroman’s property was appointed and such receiver is a party defendant. The defendants William W. and Josiah Zelie, as executors, are the holders of a second mortgage upon the premises covered by the mortgage sought to be foreclosed. The Complaint and a notice of the pendency of the action were filed in the clerk’s office June 5, 1897. The summons was personally served upon the defendant Josiah Zelie, as executor, August 18, 1897,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. BiberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  2. Shostack v. HaskellNew York Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hess v. FeltNew York Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API