Legal Opinion

New York Water Service Corp. v. Palisades Interstate Park Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 16, 1961Published

1Opinion of the Court

In our opinion, defendant is included, by definition, within the category of public corporations (General Corporation Law, § 2) and, therefore, is subject to examination before trial pursuant to section 292-a of the Civil Practice Act (cf. Ramapo Mountains Water, Power & Serv. Co. v. Commissioners of Palisades Interstate Park, 177 App. Div. 700; Kirkman v. Commissioners of Palisades Interstate Park, 200 *795App. Div. 870). Our decision in Conklin v. Palisades Interstate Park Comm. (282 App. Div. 728) is not to the contrary. There it was held that the County Court had no jurisdiction of a tort…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Conklin v. Palisades Interstate Park CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. Kirkman v. Commissioners of Palisades Interstate ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Ramapo Mountains Water, Power & Service Co. v. Commissioners of the Palisades Interstate ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API