Legal Opinion

Contreras v. Randi's Enterprise, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 2015No. 519193Published

1DissentLynch, J.

We respectfully dissent. A party is not liable for injuries caused by dangerous or defective conditions on property unless the party owns, occupies, controls or has special use of the property (see Giglio v Saratoga Care, Inc., 117 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2014]; Turrisi v Ponderosa, Inc., 179 AD2d 956, 957 [1992]). Here, although defendant K.C. Custom *1201Framing, LLC (hereinafter defendant) primarily conducted business at a location across the street from 68 Weibel Avenue, it also occupied and, as relevant here, accepted deliveries at 68 Weibel Avenue. Plaintiff Billie Contreras (hereinafter plaintiff)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Turrisi v. Ponderosa, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Chadis v. Grand Union Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Hoberman v. Kids "R" Us, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Giglio v. Saratoga Care, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Bridgham v. Fairview Plaza, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API