Hamel v. Gootkin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
The trial court determined that when Maude Cook Duin, now deceased, executed trust deeds on parcels of real property held by her and the respondent Gootkin in joint tenancy, a termination of the joint tenancy did not occur and that upon her death the title of the surviving joint tenant was not subject to the trust deeds. Mr. Gootkin did not consent to the execution of the trust deeds and was not aware thereof until after Maude Cook Duin’s death. The sole question presented on this appeal is whether such determination was correct as a matter of law.
In People v. Nogarr, 164 Cal.App.2d 591 [330…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Zeigler v. BonnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Burns v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Gau v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Hammond v. McArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tenhet v. BoswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Wutzke v. Bill Reid Painting Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Ba Properties Inc. v. Government Of The United States Virgin IslandsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Brant v. HargroveCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.