Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHAEL R., Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1996No. 95-10442PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge:

This appeal presents a constitutional challenge to the juvenile handgun possession law, 18 U.S.C. § 922(x)(2). The question of constitutionality under the Commerce Clause is one of first impression in the Ninth Circuit, indeed in any court of appeals. Also on appeal here is the trial court’s denial of appellant’s suppression motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 1294. We AFFIRM.

I

On June 23, 1995, Clayton Alan Kidd (“Kidd”), a Lieutenant with the Tucson Police Department, was on patrol in a relatively high crime area; he was working in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando Lopez-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Torres-Lopez v. MayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Rene E.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. CardozaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. John Leonard Rousseau, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API