Legal Opinion

Weisblatt v. United Aircraft Corporation

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1957No. 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

Appellant, having secured a judgment against one Henry W. Peeples, an employee of appellee corporation, issued a writ of attachment on the judgment for the purpose of seizing credits of Peeples in the hands of the corporation, serving the writ on an employee in its office maintained in the District. Counsel for the corporation filed a written motion to quash the attachment, principally on the ground that his client was not “doing business” in this District within the meaning of Code 1951, § 13-103, and accordingly was not amenable to legal process here. At the hearing on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mueller Brass Co. v. Alexander Milburn Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Whitaker v. MacFadden Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. Fehlhaber Pile Co. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  4. Lichtenberg v. Bullis School, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Environmental Research International, Inc. v. Lockwood Greene Engineers, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Rose v. SilverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Hughes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Companhia Brasileira Carbureto De Calcio—CBCC v. Applied Industrial Materials Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc. v. SkillmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API