Legal Opinion

State v. Parke

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 26, 2009No. Case No. 20070840-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Judge:

¶ 1 This appeal presents the question of whether a protective frisk is constitutional when the facts show that the police officer effectuating a traffic stop subjectively believed the driver’s shoulder movement indicated that the driver may have been hiding a weapon or narcotics in his waistband area; the driver became “somewhat agitated” and questioned the police officer’s order to place both of his hands outside the window; and in the police officer’s experience, the area he patrolled was “very dangerous.” When objectively considering the totality of the circumstances, we…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  2. State v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  3. State v. HinmonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  4. State v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API