State v. Parke
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Judge:
¶ 1 This appeal presents the question of whether a protective frisk is constitutional when the facts show that the police officer effectuating a traffic stop subjectively believed the driver’s shoulder movement indicated that the driver may have been hiding a weapon or narcotics in his waistband area; the driver became “somewhat agitated” and questioned the police officer’s order to place both of his hands outside the window; and in the police officer’s experience, the area he patrolled was “very dangerous.” When objectively considering the totality of the circumstances, we…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Maryland v. BuieSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- State v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
- State v. HinmonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- State v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009