Legal Opinion · Dissent

Keller v. Reichert

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1922Published

1DissentBeoNsoN, J.

The majority opinion finds the testimony of the legatee, Mary Keller, covering conversations with the deceased, admissible; that a proceeding contesting the probate of a wilt *87does not fall within the prohibitory terms of § 7871, Comp. Laws, 1913. With this view, I cannot agree. The express terms of the statute must be considered in connection with the cognate law and the legislative policy involved therein ever since statehood. The statute existed in territorial days. Terr. Code Civ. Proc. 1877, § 446. It has not been changed except by a restrictive provision concerning officers of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. St. John v. LoflandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Mackey v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Lake Grocery Co. v. ChiostriNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Druey v. BaldwinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Mowry v. Gold Stabeck Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API