Furst v. Meek

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Tilford

Affirming in part and reversing in part.

On May 7, 1936, the appellants sued W. H. Meek as principal, and J. D. Ward, I. S. Ward, and Robey Lewis as Ms sureties, to recover $840.73, witb interest from July 14, 1933, allegedly due for merchandise sold under a written contract. Defenses were interposed and the issues joined, following which ensued the errors of Court and Counsel which resulted in the dilemma from which appellants seek to be extricated. A brief presentation in chronological order of the steps taken may prove helpful in visualizing the questions…