Legal Opinion
State v. Wright
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 19, 2010No. 62142-4-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
230 P.3d 1063 (2010)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Roger Sinclair WRIGHT, Appellant.
No. 62142-4-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
April 19, 2010.
Richard Hansen, Ariella Wagonfeld, Allen Hansen & Maybrown PS, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Stephen Hobbs, Office of the Prosecuting Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
SCHINDLER, J.
¶ 1 In an unpublished opinion, we rejected Roger Sinclair Wright's argument that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the officer lacked justification to stop him for a traffic infraction or that the traffic stop was a pretext, and…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SnappWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SwetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. SwetzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- State v. SnappWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. SnappWashington Supreme Court · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.