Rudy Franklin Homan v. United States

In a proceeding under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 in the district court, appellant contested his pleas of guilty to charges of burglarizing two banks on the following grounds: (a) improper representation by retained counsel, (b) appellant under influence of narcotics at the time the pleas were entered, (c) pleas induced on promise of specific sentence and place of service, (d) appellant did not understand the nature of charges against him, and (e) improper sentences under 18 U.S.C.A. § 2113(a), (b) and (c). The district court denied relief after a full evidentiary hearing and on written findings of…