Legal Opinion

Heise v. Weikart

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1934No. 923Published

1Opinion of the Court

*48OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

Four errors are assigned by defendant:

1. ’ That the verdict was manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

2. Excessive damages, claimed to have been given under the influence of passion and prejudice.

3. Error in the charge of the court.

4. Error in the giving of special charges before argument.

A reading of the record in this case leads the members of this court to the unanimous conclusion that the verdict and judgment herein are not manifestly against the weight of the evidence.

It must be remembered that the negligence of the driver of the car in which decedent was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rothgery v. SeatonOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API