Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided January 29, 2003No. 03-01-00457-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. ONION, JR., Justice (Retired).
Appellant Samuel Ramirez was convicted by a jury of official oppression. Tex. Pen.Code Ann. § 39.03 (West 1994). 1 The trial court assessed his punishment at three months in the county jail.
Points of Error
Appellant advances three points of error. First, appellant urges that the trial court erred in permitting a clinical social worker to testify as an expert witness outside of her field of expertise and to give opinion evidence regarding the complainant, based on a review by the witness of a report by a non-testifying “psychologist,” whose own…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Alexander v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Yates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Espinosa v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- Alfredo DeLaCruz v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2021
- Armando Ochoa v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.