Legal Opinion
Cavanaugh v. Cardinal Local School District
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 19, 2005No. 03-4231Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants David and Bonnie Cavanaugh (“the Cavanaughs”), on behalf of their minor child, Kyle Cavanaugh, appeal the Magistrate Judge’s order denying their claim that Defendant-Appellee Cardinal Local School District (“Cardinal”) did not provide Kyle, who is disabled, with a “Free Appropriate Public Education” (“FAPE”) as required by the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. Bonnie Cavanaugh initiated this case on April 2, 2001, by filing a request for a due process hearing with the Ohio Department of Education,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kuhnle Brothers, Inc. v. County of GeaugaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Gean v. HattawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- First National Bank of Salem, Ohio v. Harry D. HirschCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Carole J. Southerland v. Hardaway Management Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.