Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Hatfield

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 2009No. 2008-0045Published

1DissentO’Connor, J.

{¶ 2} I disagree strongly with the court’s decision to dismiss this appeal as having been improvidently accepted.

{¶ 3} I believe that the jury’s prerogative to decide matters fairly, using the evidence admitted by the court and common knowledge garnered outside the courtroom, should be respected. Because there was sufficient, probative evidence from which the jurors could find that Sonny Hatfield acted recklessly by operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of cocaine, I would reverse the decision of the court of appeals and reinstate Hatfield’s conviction for aggravated vehicular…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. D'AMATO v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. State v. McClendonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. State v. StrongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  5. State v. McKnightSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API