Fisher v. Lord
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGGLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff sued upon an insurance contract with defendant and recovered judgment in the District Court which upon appeal was reversed by this court. Fisher v. Underwriters at Lloyd’s London, 7 Cir., 115 F.2d 641. A full discussion of the facts and the respective contentions appears in that opinion. Upon remand “with directions to proceed in the manner provided by law” the District Court, pursuant to what it conceived to be its duty under the mandate of this court, peremptorily entered judgment against plaintiff on the merits and for costs, and plaintiff has now become…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Fisher v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Brunet v. S. S. Kresge Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Millers' Mut. Fire Ins. Ass'n of Illinois v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Knox v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Knox v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1953