Legal Opinion

Barnhart v. Aiken

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1931PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLÍNGER, J.

' Neither in pleading nor proof is any* statement of fact offered or suggested, that, had the service of summons been regular and the plaintiff in this proceeding been notified in fact, that he had and would have intei posed a defense of any kind or character or that the finding and decree would have been any different from what it is.

A court .of equity will not interfere with •tbe enforcement of a judgment rendered at law unless it is unjust and unconscionable,, and therefore relief will not be given unless complainant shows that he had a good and meritorious defense to: the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ray v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Cieslikowski v. RadeckiOhio Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API