Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Rogers Auto Collision, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 5, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in allowing the plaintiff to reopen his case to present a bank statement as proof that he was ready, willing, and able to purchase the subject premises (see Bennett v Henry, 39 AD3d 575, 576 [2007]; Kay Found. v S & F Towing Serv. of Staten Is., Inc., 31 AD3d 499, 501 [2006]; Lagana v French, 145 AD2d 541, 542 [1988]; Kennedy v Peninsula Hosp. Ctr., 135 AD2d 788, 791 [1987]). “A Trial Judge has the right to permit the introduction of evidence after the close of the offerer’s case or to prohibit the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Elkaim v. ElkaimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Kennedy v. Peninsula Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- CNR Healthcare Network, Inc. v. 86 Lefferts Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kay Foundation v. S & F Towing Services of Staten Island, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Lagana v. FrenchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eastman v. NashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- MRI Enters., Inc. v. Comprehensive Med. Care of N.Y., P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- New York Tile Wholesale Corp. v. Thomas Fatato Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025