Legal Opinion

People v. Heeley

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1928No. Docket No. 1578PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, P. J.

Defendant was convicted upon a criminal charge and appeals from the judgment and from an order of the trial court denying his motion for a new trial.

The only point made by appellant is that the trial court erred in denying a motion to dismiss the information under which he was prosecuted, on the ground that it was not filed within fifteen days after he was committed by the magistrate who conducted his preliminary examination. This exact question has been decided by us lately in the proceeding entitled Gillis v. Superior Court, 89 Cal. App. 687 [265 Pac. 360], the opinion in which has not yet…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re BegerowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Ex Parte FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Gillis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. GangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. GangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API