McDonald v. State

On State’s Motion for Rehearing.

MORROW, P. J.

In his motion for re-' hearing, state’s counsel insists that the testimony with reference to the location of the wounds upon'the deceased was misinterpreted by this court in its original opinion. In view of the evidence, in the opinion of the writer, the location of the wounds inflicted upon the deceased is a matter of no importance as bearing upon the legal «question controlling the disposition of the appeal.

- From the testimony of the appellant, the following appears: He was a deputy sheriff. An individual by the name of “Dutch” or Henry Dietz,…