Legal Opinion

Chicago Fire & Marine Insurance v. Sharpensteen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1930No. Civil No. 2907PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, J.

On March 15, 1928, C. C. Sharpensteen sold an automobile to one F. J. Woods under a conditional sales contract and within a few days thereafter the Chicago Fire and Marine Insurance Company of Chicago, for a consideration of $12.50 insured him against loss sustained by reason, among other things, of “the fraudulent concealment or disposal of said automobile by the vendee with intent to defraud the vendor.” The car was driven from the state in April afterwards by the vendee without the consent of the vendor and never recov ered. Proof of loss in the snm of $292.75, the amount due thereon, was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Life & Casualty Ins. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Huestess v. South Atlantic Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. Morrison v. Wisconsin Odd Fellows' Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Skinner v. . NormanNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Edmonds v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Centrust Mortgage Corp. v. PMI Mortgage InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. London Assurance v. Lutfy Et UxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API