Legal Opinion
Maurice River Bd. of Educ. v. MAURICE RIVER ETC.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 22, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
193 N.J. Super. 488 (1984)
475 A.2d 59
MAURICE RIVER TP. BD. OF EDUC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
MAURICE RIVER TOWNSHIP TEACHERS ASSOCIATION AND NEW JERSEY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 6, 1984.
Decided February 22, 1984.
Before Judges BISCHOFF, PETRELLA and BRODY.
Rushton H. Ridgway argued the cause for appellant (Milstead & Ridgway, attorneys; Louis G. Rubino on the brief).
Steven R. Cohen argued the cause for respondents (Selikoff & Cohen, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by BISCHOFF, P.J.A.D.
The issue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chandler v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Belcher v. MansiDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
- Maurice River Bd. of Ed. v. Maurice River Tchrs.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tarus v. Borough of Pine HillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Csorny v. Shoreham-Wading River Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Tarus v. Borough of Pine HillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- Wright v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Opinion No. (1995), Missouri Attorney General Reports1995