Legal Opinion

Hempel v. School District No. 329

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1936No. 25951. En BancPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

The appellant, as plaintiff, sought by this action to permanently enjoin the defendant school district and its officers from carrying* on, or permitting to be carried on, in its school building or on its premises anything in the nature of commercial activities such as the sale of candy and ice cream and the serving of lunches. The theory of the complaint was that these activities were being* carried on by the use of public money or upon the credit of the school district; and that the plaintiff, a resident and a taxpayer of the district and a merchant dealing in similar merchandise in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seattle High School Chapter No. 200 v. SharplesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Juntila v. Everett School District No. 24Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Ralph v. Orleans Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. McGilvra v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Villyard v. Regents of University SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API