Ex parte Kellogg
California Supreme Court
Application for writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The petitioner claims to be illegally restrained of his liberty by the sheriff of the city and county of San Francisco, and seeks to be discharged on habeas corpus.
The facts appear to be these: In 1882 one Rankin recovered a judgment in the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco against the petitioner and others for the sum of eighteen hundred dollars, or thereabouts, on which execution was issued and placed in the hands of the sheriff. The execution having been returned wholly unsatisfied, an order was duly made by the court pursuant to sections 714, et seq., of the Code of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Galland v. GallandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by12 opinions
- Clay v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Lineker v. DillonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1921
- Burnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Rosin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Dubón v. Casanova CintrónSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.