Legal Opinion

Capone v. Hinck

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 3, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.

The plaintiff instituted this suit to recover the sum of $500 for damages, for the alleged breach of covenant of quiet enjoyment under a lease dated December 18, 1928. The second cause of action for the return of $100 security was withdrawn upon the trial.

For all practical purposes this action was tried on an agreed statement of facts.

The principal question involved herein is whether or not the defendant Hinck, as an original lessor, is liable to the plaintiff herein, the original lessee, on a covenant of quiet enjoyment contained in the lease. In May, 1936, the holder of the first mortgage…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Prudence Co. v. 160 West Seventy-Third Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Parkinson v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Fowler v. PolingNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Mitchell v. . BartlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Patterson v. GMAC Mortgage, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API