Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 12, 1994No. 3-92-046-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1DissentPowers, Justice

I withdraw my dissenting and concurring opinion dated May 25, 1994, and substitute the following in its place. Believing Gulf States has been deprived of property without due process of law, I respectfully dissent.

THE RIGHT TO AN AGENCY ADJUDICATION

Under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, Gulf States possesses a property interest in an agency decision in the contested case now before us — a written decision arrived at according to the terms of the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA)1 and the Texas Administrative Procedure Act (APA).2 See Logan v. Zimmerman…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  4. West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Grigsby v. ReibTexas Supreme Court · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility RatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API