Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility Rates
Court of Appeals of Texas
1DissentPowers, Justice
I withdraw my dissenting and concurring opinion dated May 25, 1994, and substitute the following in its place. Believing Gulf States has been deprived of property without due process of law, I respectfully dissent.
THE RIGHT TO AN AGENCY ADJUDICATION
Under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, Gulf States possesses a property interest in an agency decision in the contested case now before us — a written decision arrived at according to the terms of the Public Utility Regulatory Act (PURA)1 and the Texas Administrative Procedure Act (APA).2 See Logan v. Zimmerman…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
- West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Grigsby v. ReibTexas Supreme Court · 1913
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gulf States Utilities Co. v. Coalition of Cities for Affordable Utility RatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994