Legal Opinion

Ruppert v. Alliant Energy Cash Balance Pension Plan

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 22, 2008No. 3:08-cr-00127PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

This proposed class action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA for short), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, is before the court on the motion of defendant Alliant Energy Cash Balance Pension Plan to dismiss plaintiff Lawrence G. Ruppert’s first amended complaint on the ground that plaintiff has not exhausted the remedies available to him under the terms of defendant Plan. Plaintiff denies that exhaustion is required in a case such as his, where he is challenging a benefit plan’s compliance with ERISA rather than an act or omission…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. 188 LLC v. Trinity Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Amato v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. William J. Kross v. Western Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Pens. Plan Guide P 23918v Diane L. Lindemann v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. David Berger and Gerry Tsupros, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated v. Xerox Corporation Retirement Income Guarantee PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thompson v. Retirement Plan for Employees of S.C. Johnson & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API