Rohlfing v. Cat's Paw Rubber Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
LA BUY, District Judge.
Motion of Sears, Roebuck and Co.
The defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co., one of eight defendants alleged to operate chains of shoe repair stores or department stores having shoe repair departments, moves the court pursuant to Rule 56(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to specify that the following material facts exist without substantial controversy:(1) the defendant Sears made no purchases of shoe supplies from, any of the' defendants, except shoe polish from the defendants Griffin Manufacturing Co. and Knomark Manufacturing Co., and leather soles…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rector v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1952
- Axton-Fisher Tobacco Co. v. Ziffrin Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1941
- Ziffrin Truck Lines, Inc. v. Axton-Fisher Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
3Cited by2 opinions
- Continental Distributing Co., Inc. v. Somerset Importers, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
- Sparkman v. Comerica BankDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025