Legal Opinion

Levengood v. Hoople

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1890No. 14,281PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

This was a suit in the St. Joseph Circuit •Court for the partition of the land described in the complaint, and, also, to quiet the title to the same as against the appellee Mary Hoople. It appears by the complaint that David Rupert died in the month of November, 1870, seized in fee ■of the land in dispute, and leaving as his only heirs the appellee Mary Hoople and five children, among whom is the appellant Emma Levengood. At the time of his death the .said David Rupert left a will containing the following clause:

*28“First, I give and bequeath to my wife Mary and heirs, for her to dispose of as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. MiddlesworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Stilwell v. KnapperIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. South v. SouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Harmon v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Coon v. BeanIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bowser v. MattlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. McMillan v. Deering & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Thompson v. PattenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Neely v. BoyceIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API