Dillingham v. Dillingham
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the corrected final judgment of dissolution of marriage in part, and reverse in part. We agree with appellant that trial courts should determine all matters regarding child custody in accordance with the best interests of the child, defined to “include an evaluation of all factors affecting the welfare and interests of the child.” § 61.13(3), Fla.Stat. (1993). Here the former wife has no basis to complain about the scope of the inquiry, however, since the trial court granted her requests regarding parental responsibility, primary residence, and visitation. The minor child remains,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mize v. MizeSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Gligorijevic v. GligorijevicDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Canterbury v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Rusher v. RiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Keitel v. KeitelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2003
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports1997
- Opinion Number, Louisiana Attorney General Reports2001