Legal Opinion

McClain v. Hardy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 23, 2002No. 9911-92126; A116795Published

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In this probate case, the personal representative of decedent’s estate appeals an order that distributes decedent’s net estate to Daniel Hardy, decedent’s brother. The personal representative argues that, because the will contains no provision for the disposition of the net estate, pursuant to ORS 112.015, the net estate must pass to decedent’s only child, Deborah Smith, in accordance with the law of intestate succession. Hardy argues that ORS 112.015 does not apply in this case, because decedent clearly expressed an intention that Smith not receive the net estate. We agree with the personal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Estate of BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Re Estate of CancikIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Cook v. Estate of SeemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API