Roberts v. Hudson
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GIYENS, O. J.
Respondent brought suit September 7, 1927, on a promissory note due October 1, 1920, and as an excuse for the delay in bringing the suit, exceeding the statutory period, alleged that the appellants had been out of the state during most of the time since the maturity of the note. Appellants by their answer interposed the bar of the statute of limitations and denied such absence from the state as to toll the statute.
Appellants, husband and wife, assign as error the insufficiency of the evidence to show such absence from the state as to toll the statute of limitations, and also urge…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Simonton v. SimontonIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- MacLeod v. StelleIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Watt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Cole v. . JessupNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- First Nat. Bank of Pocatello v. PolingIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Despain v. DespainIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Staten v. WeissIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
- Pierson v. PiersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1941