Legal Opinion
Ruth M. Hemphill v. John B. Smith and Gaylord Magnuson
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided June 2, 1993No. 03-92-00471-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Hemphill v. Smith
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,
AT AUSTIN
NO. 3-92-471-CV
RUTH M. HEMPHILL,
APPELLANT
vs.
JOHN B. SMITH AND GAYLORD MAGNUSON,
APPELLEES
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 473,039, HONORABLE JERRY DELLANA, JUDGE PRESIDING
2Per curiam
Appellant Ruth Hemphill sued appellees John Smith and Gaylord Magnuson for conversion, breach of a claimed duty of good faith and fair dealing, and violations of the Deceptive Trade Practices--Consumer Protection Act, Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. §§ 17.41-.854 (West 1987 & Supp. 1993) (DTPA). From the trial court's…
3Cases cited27 opinions
- Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Ames v. Great Southern BankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- O'NEIL v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.