Legal Opinion

Leeds v. Leeds

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley Harwood, J.

Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment in favor of plaintiff is denied.

The parties to this recently commenced divorce action were married in November, 1962, and have two children, now ages 21 and 14. Defendant, a millionaire, abandoned plaintiff, a housewife, in January, 1981. He has been paying $200 weekly for the support of plaintiff and the parties’ younger child, who resides with plaintiff in the marital home; he also pays the maid’s salary and the bills and expenses on the marital property.

Plaintiff’s action for divorce is grounded on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Christian v. ChristianNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Gleason v. GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Dalminter, Inc. v. DalmineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Dalminter, Inc. v. Dalmine, S. p. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Librizzi v. LibrizziNew York Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leeds v. LeedsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Wald v. WaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Ullo v. UlloNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API