Legal Opinion

Fain v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 1985No. CR 84-196PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

David Fain, an inmate in the Arkansas penitentiary, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus to require A. L. Lockhart, the Director of the Arkansas Department of Correction to recalculate Fain’s eligibility for parole. Fain had been determined to be not eligible for parole. The trial court properly denied the petition.

Fain had four convictions. In 1980 he was sentenced as a second offender under Act 93 of 1977, which determines parole eligibility, to a total of 21 years. For a subsequent crime, he was sentenced as a third offender to 24 years, to be served…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lovell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Pyro Mining Co. v. Kentucky Commission On Human RightsKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Cridge v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Mitchem v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Abdullah v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Mason v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API