In re Bacigalupo
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KENNARD, J.
On petitioner’s automatic appeal in this death penalty case, we affirmed the judgment. Thereafter, petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition. We ordered an evidentiary hearing on petitioner’s claim that the prosecution had failed to disclose evidence that would have supported a case in mitigation at the penalty phase that petitioner committed the two murders *315because of a Colombian drug cartel’s death threats against him and his family. After hearing the testimony of 17 witnesses, the referee found merit to petitioner’s claim. We uphold that determination by the referee, and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- In re FriendCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- In re Bennett, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re BoyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.