Legal Opinion

Eichenberg v. Marcy

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 28, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Assumpsit. On defendant’s motion to be released from arrest.

1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.

This is an application by the defendant, under Pub. Stat. R. I. cap. 206, § 9, for release from arrest, which was made upon the writ in this case in pursuance of an affidavit endorsed thereon, charging that said defendant had committed fraud in the disposition of his property.

Said affidavit was made under said § 9, which provides, amongst other things, that a writ of arrest may .be issued, c ‘ whenever the plaintiff in an action to be commenced by such writ, his agent or attorney, shall make an affidavit to be en dorsecl thereon, or, annexed thereto, that the plaintiff has a just claim…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Hennequin v. ClewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Jones v. FalesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  4. Wolf v. StixSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Potter v. McDowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Clark's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
  2. State v. KaneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API