Legal Opinion
Bose Corporation v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 19, 2020No. 1:19-cv-07467Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BOSE CORPORATION, Plaintiff, No. 19 C 7467 v. Judge Thomas M. Durkin THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Bose Corporation alleges that Defendants sell counterfeit versions of Bose products in violation of the Lanham Act and Illinois law. Each defendant is alleged to be located in China and is identified only by the alias it uses to sell products on eBay, because Bose has no further information about the Defendants’ identities.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Peso Chavez and Gregory Lee, Individually and on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated v. The Illinois State Police, Terrance W. Gainer, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Director of the Illinois State Police, Michael Snyders, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Illinois State Police Operation Valkyrie Coordinator, Edward Kresl, Individually and in His Official Capacity as District Commander of the Illinois State Police, and Larry Thomas, Daniel Gillette, Craig Graham, Robert P. Cessna, Robert Lauterbach, and Dale Fraher, Officers of the Illinois State Police, in Their Individual CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- UWM Student Association v. Michael LovellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.