Legal Opinion

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Ring Screw Works

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided July 25, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 89-72701-DTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

FEIKENS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are a labor union and its local (collectively, “the UAW”). Defendant (“Ring Screw”) employs UAW members (“employees”). The UAW seeks damages on behalf of employees who were made to choose between contributing to their nonunion-negotiated health maintenance organization (“HMO”) insurance plans, previously provided by Ring Screw at no cost, and reverting to a free, union-negotiated plan that does not cover pre-existing conditions. The UAW alleges that Ring Screw breached the Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”), which allegedly…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. The Health Care Plan, Inc. v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Health Care Plan, Inc. v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1991
  3. Pennsylvania State University v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API