Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Christenson v. Jewkes

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1988No. 19984Published

1ConcurrenceZimmerman, Justice

I agree that the decision below should be affirmed. However, I join the result reached by the majority only because any error committed by the trial court in unreasonably refusing either to grant a continuance or to exclude the evidence made known to Christenson immediately before trial in violation of the court’s orders has not been shown to have sufficiently undermined the outcome so as to lead me to believe that the error was harmful under the harmless error test of Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 61 and Utah Rule of Evidence 103(a). See Ashton v. Ashton, 733 P.2d 147, 154 (Utah 1987);…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Ashton v. AshtonUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Redevelopment Agency of Roy v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API