Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Temporary State Housing Rent Commission

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1959Published

1Opinion of the Court

Edgar J. Nathan, Jr., J.

This is an article 78 proceeding to review the determination of the respondent which granted rent increases.

The landlord attacks the determination on the ground that the respondent arbitrarily refused to apportion the painting expense on a two-year basis.

Petitioner contends that the painting practice in the subject building required painting the apartments every two years. This claim is predicated on the fact that orders were issued by the respondent based on a two-year painting practice with respect to 8 out of 45 units in the building. Petitioner was unable to show…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Various Tenants of 29 Woodmere Boulevard v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Wasmil Realty Corp. v. McGoldrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API