Legal Opinion
Donna Crooks Brenda Holmes v. John H. Maynard, District Judge
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 31, 1990No. 89-35660PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
This case is now before this panel for the third and final time. The litigants and procedural posture in this matter are as follows. The Honorable John H. Maynard was a District Judge for the Second District of the State of Idaho where he also served as Administrative District Judge. The appellants, Donna Crooks and Brenda Holmes, brought 42 U.S.C. § 1983 actions against Judge Maynard. Appellants claimed that Judge Maynard denied their constitutional right to procedural due process by jailing them pursuant to a contempt order. The district court granted…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Joseph Brewer v. M. Prentiss BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Arnold v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Robert David Figueroa v. Audrey P. BlackburnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Moore v. BrewsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Ernest J. Franceschi, Jr., Esq. v. Kenneth Schwartz, Commissioner of South Orange County Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Donald L. Meek v. County of Riverside, and Albert J. Wojcik, Judge, Riverside Municipal Court Rodney Walker, Judge, Riverside Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Sadoski v. MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.