Legal Opinion

Bishop v. Baumgartner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 18, 2013No. S12F1737PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENHAM, Justice.

Acting pursuant to Rule 34 (4) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of Georgia, we granted appellant Andrew Bishop’s application for *461discretionary review of the final judgment and decree of divorce that awarded sole legal and physical custody of his two-year-old daughter to appellee Erika Baumgartner (“Mother”) and gave no visitation to Bishop (“Father”). The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying visitation to Father. Since evidence in the record supports the trial court’s exercise of its discretion, we conclude that the trial court did…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horn v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. Frazier v. FrazierSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  2. Terrell v. TerrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  3. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API