Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sonder v. Sonder

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1988No. 2259, 3025Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCavanaugh, Judge

I dissent from that part of the majority opinion entitled “Section E. Contempt Parameters on Agreement ” which reversed the order of contempt entered against the appel*514lant and vacated the order of attachment at Appeal No. 01343 Philadelphia, 1986. I would affirm the order of contempt based on the appellant’s willful failure to comply with the Court’s order directing that he carry out the terms of the support agreement he voluntarily entered.

Three judges of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County gave separate consideration to the appellant’s conduct in refusing to comply with the terms…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re MartoranoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. MarconeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Janet D. v. CarrosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Magaziner v. MagazinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API