Legal Opinion

Faile v. Bycura

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided November 14, 1988No. 1247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This is a medical malpractice case. Ethel Faile sued Dr. Blair Bycura, a podiatrist, claiming the surgical procedure he performed on her feet was inappropriate treatment for heel spurs. The jury returned a verdict for Bycura. Faile appeals. We affirm.

Faile consulted Bycura in 1983 on referral from another podiatrist. This podiatrist had treated her heel pain with cortisone injections for several years. X-rays taken by Bycura revealed heel spurs in both feet. Faile claims she was only bothered with pain in the right foot and had no problem with the left. Bycura recommended and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hook Ex Rel. Estate of Summers v. RothsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Botehlo v. BycuraCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Bonaparte v. FloydCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. HammondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jensen v. Archbishop Bergan Mercy HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Spar v. ChaIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Gunther v. Charlotte Baseball, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API